An Ordinary Person

Book Review: Bad Samaritans

August 31, 2008
3 Comments

Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism by Ha-Joon Chang

South Korean economist Ha-Joon Chang’s book turns conventional wisdom and logic about neoliberal “free trade” — the official ideology of how rich countries became rich and the policies developing countries are supposed to follow to prosperity — on its head. Taking a long-range, historical view of global economics, Chang debunks myths and misconceptions about contemporary understanding of the free trade model of economic development.

Free-trade globalization orthodoxy, according to Chang, argues that the only path to development is to follow certain economic prescriptions:

[P]rivatize state-owned enterprises, maintain low inflation, reduce the size of government bureaucracy, balance the budget (if not running a surplus), liberalize trade, deregulate foreign investment, deregulate capital markets, make the currency convertible, reduce corruption and privatize pensions.

According to Chang, had countries such as South Korea and Japan followed these policies early on in their economic development, their industries would, at best, be junior partners to western companies or at worst, would have been wiped out by the competition. Japan and South Korean would have remained third-rate economic powers instead of the economic and technological powerhouses they are today.

The (Not So) Secret History of Capitalism

Chang argues that through institutions like the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund, industrialized nations have been successful in forcing developing countries to adopt free-trade policies as preconditions for loans and aid. Chang argues that such agreements are made in bad faith because the developed countries, themselves, would have never attained development of their economies had they followed these policies, themselves, earlier in their history.

Chang argues that rather than follow laissez-faire, free-trade as the path to development, current economic giants in Western Europe and the U.S. followed a protectionist strategy that combined military might, exploitation of colonies, high tariffs, strong regulation of foreign trade and investment, domestic subsidies, and strong restrictions to foreign competition in key industries.

Chang argues that the industrialized world nurtured and subsidized “infant industries” — industries that were regarded as long-term investments to be protected from direct foreign competition — until these industries were strong enough to compete in the global market. Virtually all developed countries took this path to economic development, including the much ballyhooed South Korean and Japanese economies. Had these infant industries been exposed to international competition too soon, Chang argues, they would have been wiped out.

By forcing developing countries to adopt free-trade economic policies, rich countries are “kicking away the ladder” of the only tried and true path to economic development presumably, to eliminate future competition. By exposing the economies and domestic markets of developing countries to global forces, Chang argues that home-grown industries are not given a chance to develop and grow. Developing countries, thus, remain stuck at their level of development in an unequal partnership with industrialized countries.

The Big Picture

Bad Samaritans is a book about global economics written for the mass market. It was written with the layperson in mind as its primary audience. Technical concepts and acronyms that were not everyday reading, however, were used liberally like Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), greenfield, brownfield, State-Owned Enterprises (SOE), Transnational Corporations (TNC). Getting through the book, therefore, was a minor struggle for me.

Once I got through the technical aspects and began to understand the big picture, I realized that this was a very important book with significant contributions to add to contemporary debates about globalization.

In addition to development economics for developing countries, issues such as intellectual property laws and regulations and piracy, the relationship between democracy and free markets, privatization as a development strategy, corruption in developing countries, and the role of culture in economic development are also tackled by Chang. One after another, neoliberal, free-market arguments are convincingly demolished as myth and ideology and the actual realities underlying these issues are presented as more complex than popularly understood and presented by globalization free-traders.

The Path to Development

Chang’s prescription for developing economies as a strategy for economic development can be summed up in one paragraph in the last chapter:

So far I have shown that it is important for developing countries to defy the market and deliberately promote economic activities that will raise their productivity in the long run — mainly, though not exclusively, manufacturing industries. I have argued that this involves capability-building, which, in turn, requires sacrificing certain short-term gains for the sake of raising long-term productivity (and thus standards of living) — possibly for decades.

According to Chang, the proper role of developed countries and institutions like the World Bank, IMF, and the WTO, is to get out of the way of developing countries and encourage those who are trying to follow this long-term, nationalistic and protectionist strategy.

Neoliberal, free-trade policies serve to impede and kill off these types of long-term development efforts. Rather than allow developing economies to nurture and grow their home-grown “infant industries,” free-trade policies encourage developing countries to focus their economies on less-productive activities such as agriculture which bring gains only in the short run. True economic development, according to Chang, follows from emulating and mastering advanced foreign technologies, applying them to manufacturing, and protecting national industries from foreign competition for a long time. It is decades before such efforts will bear measurable fruit but Chang argues there is no other viable path to an industrialized economy.

What is Chang’s Motivation?

Is Chang some sort of left-wing ideologue, one might argue? After demolishing free-trade arguments one after another, does Chang expose himself as an ideologue with a leftist, anti-capitalist agenda?

After reading his book I would argue that Chang is neither a leftist nor anti-capitalist. He is more of a pragmatist who appreciates the power of capitalist economies, but whose primary interest is the economic development of developing countries. His agenda is righting the imbalances in international trade regulations, policies and institutions so that developing nations can have a fair chance of catching up to the developed world. This is an arena which is ruled primarily by power and politics and is heavily dominated by the global economic powers such as the U.S., the U.K., Western Europe, Japan, China, South Korea, etc.

Chang’s agenda is to expose the hypocrisy of the industrialized world in prescribing (or much more accurately, imposing) solutions and policies on developing nations that they, themselves, would not follow because these would result in social and economic instability to their societies. His method is to show how historically, the economic powers of the world have followed policies counter to the neoliberal, free-trade orthodoxy as the pathway to development.

In the interest of fairness and if these industrialized nations truly do want to live up to their high-flown rhetoric about spreading democracy and prosperity all over the world, Chang’s argument is a challenge for the developed world to live up to their own stated ideals. Let’s call a spade a spade and implement international policies, regulations and have institutions such as the World Bank, IMF and the WTO actually help developing countries instead of hurting them.

The Liberal Arts Dude gives Bad Samaritans five stars out of five! This is an excellent, thought-provoking book that deserves a wide audience.


If You Smell What Barack is Cookin’

August 30, 2008
1 Comment

So I’ve decided to forget about my qualified support for Obama and have decided to just plain support his candidacy for President. Why? My sister is also a blogger. After last evening’s acceptance speech by Barack Obama at the Democratic National Convention she was moved to write something in her blog. This is what she had to say:

Little known fact: for about a year, while I was in high school, I contemplated a political career. I was a volunteer intern with the Democratic Coordinated Campaign in 2000, and I was hired as an intern for Senator Feingold’s office the summer between my junior and senior years. For a tiny while I thought to myself, you know what, I could be a damn fine president. Yes, I really did.

And then I realized, come on now, I’m biracial. I’m a woman. The daughter of an immigrant. It’s impossible in my lifetime. I can’t. I won’t ever be given the chance. Give up. And then I gave up.

Now imagine a girl, in high school, a teenager, mixed-race, black, Asian, Latina, native american, any girl who would have been held back by being who she was born as, imagine her having that dream today. And then watching Barack Obama’s speech tonight. And not giving up.

It’s the dreams of those young girls and boys that actually brought me to tears tonight, not anything that was said in that packed stadium in Denver. The tenuous hope, so easily taken away, that there could be a generation of children of color raised in an America with a biracial black man as its President. The dreams they’d be allowed to dream, and really believe in. The burdens of their parents that they wouldn’t feel at all. Just eight years ago, when I was in high school, dreaming, that seemed a complete impossibility. An impossibility.

I was wrong to give up, though I can’t take it back, my life is on a very different path now, and my heart is elsewhere. And I had my reasons not to hope. So far this election cycle I have been very, very doubtful about Senator Obama’s chances. He’s not President yet, he still may never be, but I’ve already been proven wrong. And I revel in it.

I didn’t believe that Americans were ready to nominate someone like Obama. Someone who looked like Obama, and had his background. I didn’t believe it because, as my family moved around the world, every time we moved back to the US, I was met with prejudice, nonacceptance, hostility, and ignorance. Not uniformly, not from everyone. But over and over again. In everyday incidences that, one by one, pounded it into my consciousness that I was not accepted, I did not belong, and it was because of what I look like, who my parents are, and where we come from. Somewhere in the back of my head, I believe that most people believe that I’m not a real American. And Barack Obama, a man with a background quite similar to mine in many respects, well, I couldn’t believe that people could put aside those prejudices that I’d felt so often in my life, and accept him as one of their own. I’m still not sure I do believe it.

But it’s not impossible anymore. And that’s enough to impress me, and amaze me, and humble me. I thought too little of America, because I was convinced that it thought so little of me, and of people like me.

Thanks for proving me wrong, Senator. You have my vote.

Liberal Arts Dude sez:

I must say I was very surprised reading the above from my sister. If you’ve read enough of this blog you will learn that I do plan on voting for Obama this coming November but my vote is a qualified one–Obama gets my vote but … and then a litany of disappointments and skepticism of the failed populist promises and betrayal of working peoples’ interests by the Democratic Party will follow.

Obama sounded like a true populist last night. He said all the right things and got my hopes up that maybe, just maybe, he is sincere about this “Change” business and that if he wins in November, he will be able to change the culture of Washington DC and politics for the better. Because he is counting on the support and mandate from an organized and engaged citizenry. As he said, the election is really not about him-it’s about us right? The citizenry whose hopes have been aroused by his candidacy and are now engaged and organized to participate in this grand experiment called Democracy.

I was impressed by the Obama campaign’s ability to elicit the type of response he did from my sister last night. Not a lot of politicians have been able to do that. Certainly not in my short lifetime. I’ve also never seen a campaign mobilize and raise money from so many ordinary people and get their hopes up.

An old story once said about President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, when a constituent met with him and made a great case for enacting reforms and policies. Roosevelt’s response: “That is all great. Now go out there and make me do it.” The story focuses on the importance and the role of the constituency in pressuring politicians from below in enacting the types of policies they want to happen.

Obama said he is running on a platform of Change. Let’s get out there and make him do it.


Kucinich Rocks It at the DNC Convention

August 28, 2008
Leave a Comment

Political Blog Reading This Week

August 24, 2008
Leave a Comment

From OpenLeft.com “The Conquest of Presidentialism” by David Sirota

The reason the presidential race gets almost all of the attention – and every other level of government gets none — is because we have come to believe democracy is a quadrennial vote for president, and that’s it…

Of course, there are beacons of light in all this. Democracy for America is about true local democracy. Their DFA-Link program, for example, is designed to help individuals in local communities connect with each other and organize around issues (and I can tell you from working with them for the last few months, they – not Moveon – are the future, if there is a future, of Internet organizing). The Bus Project, as another example, is working hard at true grassroots organizing far way from the spectacle of presidential politics. And the state-focused blogs that cover local and state politics are starting to build some shreds of democratic infrastructure.

But sadly, those examples are few and far between.

Liberal Arts Dude sez:

I think Sirota hits the nail on the head right on in terms of analyzing what is wrong with American democracy today. We — the voting populace — focus way too much on Presidential politics every four years as our exercise in mass participation in the democratic process.

Too few of us are educated, aware, and active in participating in society’s democratic institutions on the local level. I’m not just talking about elected offices and electoral politics on the city council, mayoral, school board and state levels. I am also talking how we as a society regards participating in cause-oriented activism, NGOs, and grassroots community organizing.

I have been sorely disappointed in the many examples I see in the Internet that disparage and make fun of people who seek to effect social change through activism and grassroots methods. It’s not glitzy, it’s not glamorous, and it’s not sexy. But it’s democracy in its purest sense and a gift that many, many people all over the world are willing to face death threats, intimidation, torture, and incarceration just for a chance to practice it.

And before you go out and wave your flag, sing patriotic songs and tout the glories of the superiority of American democracy to celebrate, I wasn’t saying this stuff to be patriotic or pro-American. I was castigating the short-sightedness of the majority of Americans and how they (don’t) participate in American democratic institutions.

I am highly intrigued by Democracy for America and the Bus Project that Sirota mentions as great examples of efforts to resurrect the spirit of local democratic participation. I would have to see if they are willing and open to having political independents like me participating. The last time I checked such organizations still are very focused on electoral politics for the Democratic Party (supporting Progressive Democrats to replace conservative Democrats in key state and local races).

As Multipartisan Minnesota says in the blog post “The Misunderstood Independent“:

[Grassroots organizations such as Take Action Minnesota] believe progressive change can only occur through the Democratic Party, and electing more of them. They want to show the DFL that they are a grassroots organization that can mobilize its members to help them win crucially close elections. But they do this by alienating non-partisan independents. They also believe that third-parties are not a vehicle for any type of change.

Democratic participation shouldn’t be about partisan politics as its primary goal. It should be about solving social problems in a collective fashion as a society. If I am a non-believer in partisan politics there has to be an avenue for me to throw my hat in the ring as an American citizen. Lots and lots of people believe in this conception of democratic participation.

The major political parties better take note: if a solid third of the electorate are non-partisan and focused primarily on issues rather than parties, it’s high time that they develop some sort of program that will attract and have credibility with this demographic. If both major political parties aren’t willing to accommodate non-partisan independents on their own terms, then they shouldn’t get in the way of any efforts to organize and build this third of the electorate into a coherent political force.


Wolfgang Album Coming in December

August 22, 2008
8 Comments

Dropping hints in his MySpace and Friendster accounts via strategically placed cryptic graphics on his profile, Wolfgang vocalist and frontman Basti Artadi has given Wolfgang fans around the world a reason to rejoice-a new Wolfgang album is in the works! This would be the latest album for the group since Black Mantra which was released in 2001 and shortly thereafter, the band quietly disappeared from the Philippine rock scene.

For the unitiated, Wolfgang is a hard rock/metal band from the Philippines which was the most popular local band in the Philippines in the 90s to early 2000s. Wolfgang produced five critically acclaimed albums in is heydey. Heavily influenced by Metallica and grunge, Wolfgang was an anomaly for the Philippine music scene which has been traditionally dominated by sugary-sweet pop acts. Along with The Dawn, Juan de la Cruz, Razorback and the Eraserheads, Wolfgang is often cited as one of the most influential bands in the history of Philippine rock music. Here is their Wikipedia page to give you a bit of history and background .

Wolfgang quietly disbanded around 2002. Drummer Wolf Gemora and Vocalist Basti Artadi immigrated to the U.S. and joined American musicians in other projects (Basti in San Francisco with Kitaan and Gemora in Los Angeles with the original lineup of Lokomotiv). Bassist Mon Legaspi and guitarist Manuel Legarda remained in the Philippines. Legaspi briefly played bass for The Dawn before moving on to Hong Kong. Legarda played with DRT and Razorback as well as worked in audio production companies.

Most serious Pinoy Rock and Wolfgang fans know how the next few years developed:

  • Former Razorback guitarist David Aguirre joins Gemora in Lokomotiv around 2004.
  • Also in 2004, the shocking announcement was made that Basti Artadi has joined Gemora and Aguirre in Lokomotiv making the band a quartet (with bassist Danny Gonzalez) and prompting the exit of the original singer.
  • The foursome became regulars in the Los Angeles club scene, eventually recording and releasing Lokomotiv’s debut album “Rock N Roll Death Toll” in 2005.
  • RNRDT was eventually released in the Philippines and a tour was planned. Pinoy rock fans were eager with anticipation
  • In 2006 the shocking news dropped that Basti has left Lokomotiv due to “musical and creative differences” and is retiring from the music business. The listservs were abuzz with speculation and discussion.
  • Lokomotiv holds auditions for a new singer and lands Oklahoma native Ryan Hudson. Hudson tours the Philippines in early 2007 with Lokomotiv. The band was featured in a lot of TV shows and rock venues. The album went on sale in the Philippines, but with Basti’s voice in the vocal track-the band toured without remixing the album.
  • At the same time Lokomotiv was touring the Philippines, Wolfgang and Razorback hold two sold-out reunion shows in Manila, with the original members sans Gemora and Aguirre who were touring with Lokomotiv at the time.
  • A DVD and live album of the shows, titled “Alive 2007,” was planned for release later that year but copyright issues kept the project from going forward.
  • Wolfgang (Artadi, Legarda, Legaspi with Razorback drummer Brian Velasco manning the drums tracks) release four demo tracks through Yahoo for digital download.
  • After the Philippine tour, the Lokomotiv web site goes through several makeovers and releases teasers for the new album, including the single “Flaunt” which featured a music video. Gemora starts a blog on the Pinoy Rock scene and appears to be mentoring the band Kastigo.
  • The Lokomotiv web site quietly goes down in April 2008. Hudson’s MySpace page shows him as having joined a new band in LA called Dog Zebra. Aguirre and Gonzalez resurrects Aguirre’s solo project A.D.D. with drummer Aaron Ascano and they start gigs in the LA area. No official announcement has been given to date by any of the members as to the status of Lokomotiv and whether they will release the second album with Hudson’s vocals on the tracks.
  • In late 2008, strange graphics start appearing in Basti’s Friendster and MySpace sites that seem to suggest a new Wolfgang album in the works. Superfan Aleck Pulido pulls together a timeline and Philmusic.com confirms the project. Wolfgang’s “Villains” is slated to drop in December 2008. No word yet on whether this will be independently released or through a major label.

Whew! So there you have it. A mini-chronicle of the various twists and turns of the story of Wolfgang and its members. I am a huge Wolfgang fan (I discovered them in 2002 after they have already disbanded). Since then I have built up a respectable collection of all their albums including several bootlegs, Kitaan’s demo, Lokomotiv’s RNRDT album and the four Yahoo tracks released by Wolfgang in 2007. I am curious how the new Wolfgang album sounds and whether or not Wolf Gemora will be a part of the project. I guess we will just have to wait and see!

UPDATE


Next Page »

    About Me

    A regular guy living in irregular times

    Search

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.